Atgal į BlogąTeisinė Technologija

[LT-03] Defending Your Redactions in Court...

[LT-03] A judge asked why 47% of a document was redacted. The answer 'the AI flagged it' is not legally defensible.

March 22, 20268 min skaityti
defensible redactionAI confidence scorese-discovery audit trailprivilege log requirementslegal tech compliance

[LT-03]

The "The AI Did It" Defense Fails in Court

Automated redaction tools have created a new category of legal risk: the inability to explain, document, or defend the redaction decisions an AI system made. When a judge, opposing counsel, or discovery special master asks why a specific piece of content was redacted, "the algorithm flagged it" is not an answer that satisfies Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5) privilege log requirements.

FRCP Rule 26(b)(5) requires parties withholding discov...

Pasiruošę apsaugoti savo duomenis?

Pradėkite anonimizuoti PII su 285+ subjektų tipais 48 kalbomis.