Financial Account Number Redaction in Court Filings under FRCP Rule 5.2 – CCPA/HIPAA-compliant de-identification per FRCP Rule 5.2

FRCP Rule 5.2(a)(4) limits financial account numbers in court filings to the last four digits; anonym.legal detects bank account numbers, credit card numbers, brokerage account identifiers, and routing numbers across filed documents, applying the required last-four-digit truncation to each before e-filing while preserving the surrounding financial narrative.

When this applies

Applies in federal civil matters where financial account numbers appear in pleadings or exhibits — collections cases, commercial disputes, bankruptcy preference actions, divorce proceedings removed to federal court, and any matter where bank statements, account schedules, or wire-transfer records are filed.

  1. Upload the document containing financial account numbers (PDF or DOCX).
  2. anonym.legal scans for bank account numbers, credit card numbers, brokerage account identifiers, and routing numbers in standard US financial formats.
  3. Each financial account number is reduced to its last four digits per Rule 5.2(a)(4).
  4. Transaction amounts, dates, counterparty names retained on the allow-list, and narrative context are preserved in full.
  5. A processing summary lists all identified and redacted account numbers for attorney review.
  6. Confirm the output and e-file via CM/ECF.

What you provide

  • Filing or exhibit containing financial account numbers (PDF or DOCX)
  • Party-names allow-list (bank names and institutional counterparties to retain in full)

Limitations & cautions

  • Routing numbers are financial account identifiers subject to Rule 5.2 redaction; ABA routing numbers appearing on their own (without an associated account number) may require separate handling — consult local rules.
  • anonym.legal does not review whether financial records are admissible or relevant to the claims — that is a legal and evidentiary judgment for counsel.
  • Cryptocurrency wallet addresses are not currently classified as 'financial account numbers' under Rule 5.2; they are flagged but not automatically redacted.

FAQ

Does Rule 5.2 cover credit card numbers as well as bank account numbers?

Rule 5.2(a)(4) refers to 'financial-account number' — courts have applied this to credit card numbers, bank accounts, and brokerage accounts. Apply the last-four-digit standard to any financial account number to be safe.

What if an account number appears in a contract attached as an exhibit?

Exhibits filed with the court are subject to Rule 5.2 regardless of whether they originated as contracts, statements, or correspondence. Redact all financial account numbers before filing the exhibit.

Can I request a sealed filing to avoid redacting financial records?

Rule 5.2(d) allows a party to move to file an unredacted version under seal. The public docket version must still comply with Rule 5.2(a)(4). Sealed filings require court approval and compliance with local sealing rules.

Civil Litigation

About this page

We update this page when our platform or the law changes.

Read our founder note for how we work.

Each change shows up in the timestamp at the top.

We follow these rules

  • GDPR (EU 2016/679).
  • ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
  • NIS2 (EU 2022/2555).
  • HIPAA safe harbor under 45 CFR § 164.514(b)(2).

Our promise

We do not sell your data.

We do not train models on your text.

We store your files in Germany.

You can delete your account at any time.

You own your work.

Where we run

Our servers live in Falkenstein, Germany.

We use Hetzner. They hold ISO 27001 certification.

All data stays in the EU.

Backups run every day.

Need help?

Email support@anonym.legal.

We reply within one business day.

How we test

We run a full check suite on every release.

Each surface gets its own sweep script and report.

Human reviewers spot-check the output each week.

We track recall and precision on a labelled set.

Bad runs block the deploy.

What we never do

  • We never sell your information to third parties.
  • We never train models on what you upload.
  • We never keep your work after you delete it.
  • We never share keys with any outside firm.
  • We never run ads inside the product.

Plans in plain words

We sell credits, not seats.

One credit covers one short job.

Long jobs use a few credits each.

You can top up at any time.

Unused credits roll over each month.

Read the plans page for current rates.

Who built this

A small team of engineers and lawyers built this.

We ship from Europe and work in the open.

Our founder note spells out why we started.

Where to start

How the parts fit

A browser add-on cleans text inside Chrome.

A Word plug-in handles drafts in Office.

A small desktop tool works on whole folders.

An agent protocol link feeds large models safely.

All four share one core engine and one rule set.

Words from our team

We started this work after a lunch about cookies.

One friend kept getting odd ads on her phone.

We asked why a court file leaked through a draft.

We sketched the first build on a napkin that week.

By month three we had a tiny demo for a friend.

She used it on her first case the next day.

Common questions we hear

Can the tool read scanned PDFs? Yes, with OCR.

Does it work on long files? Yes, in small chunks.

Can I roll my own rule set? Yes, save it as a preset.

Does it run offline? The desktop build runs offline.

Do you keep my files? No, the cloud build wipes after each run.

Will it learn from my work? No, we never train on inputs.

A short tour of the workflow

Upload a file or paste a snippet of prose.

Pick the entities you want gone from the draft.

Choose a method: replace, mask, hash, encrypt, or redact.

Press run and watch the side panel show each hit.

Skim the result and tweak any rule that misfired.

Save the cleaned file or send it to a teammate.